<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: vb.net and Hungarian variable Naming Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/</link>
	<description>&#124;hobby&#124;vb.net&#124;toys&#124;ubuntu&#124;comics&#124;LPs&#124;programming&#124;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 05:44:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: hobbylobby</title>
		<link>http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>hobbylobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 14:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>soeThank rkrYou namHdDvdNet, krfFor sauPosting vveYour vjrThoughts qjkAbout zmbLoving aoyHungarian wdiNaming xjqConventions.

resI&#039;m apoSorry, iasBut eyeI empJust negDon&#039;t resAgree.

hlHobbyLobby</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>soeThank rkrYou namHdDvdNet, krfFor sauPosting vveYour vjrThoughts qjkAbout zmbLoving aoyHungarian wdiNaming xjqConventions.</p>
<p>resI&#8217;m apoSorry, iasBut eyeI empJust negDon&#8217;t resAgree.</p>
<p>hlHobbyLobby</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hobbylobby</title>
		<link>http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/#comment-2329</link>
		<dc:creator>hobbylobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 14:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/#comment-2329</guid>
		<description>My main reason for disliking the prefixes is that it makes actually reading the variable names more confusing.  

I end up reading the (often) unpronounceable prefix first, which slows my comprehension of the overall code since it invariably forces me to read slower (due to the extra brain work).

... I&#039;m serious about that.  There have been countless brain studies which prove that the brain simply can&#039;t take in information as fast as it is accustomed to when certain screwy things happen with written language.

or, just chalk it up to difference in preference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My main reason for disliking the prefixes is that it makes actually reading the variable names more confusing.  </p>
<p>I end up reading the (often) unpronounceable prefix first, which slows my comprehension of the overall code since it invariably forces me to read slower (due to the extra brain work).</p>
<p>&#8230; I&#8217;m serious about that.  There have been countless brain studies which prove that the brain simply can&#8217;t take in information as fast as it is accustomed to when certain screwy things happen with written language.</p>
<p>or, just chalk it up to difference in preference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HdDvdNet</title>
		<link>http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/#comment-2325</link>
		<dc:creator>HdDvdNet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hobbylobby.wordpress.com/2007/08/18/vbnet-and-hungarian-variable-naming-convention/#comment-2325</guid>
		<description>There is practically no good reason at all why not to use Hungarian Naming conventions besides just being lazy and worried about having to type 2-3 additional letters.

Intellisense is meant to help but for the most part programmers should not have to hover a mouse over every word to find out what it is. 

Your worried about eliminating lbl for a label prefix, why... Isnt your code cleaner being able to look at it and instantly know it is a label? Are you worried about the additional typing of bits of space those extra letters take up...

Common sense tells us as programmers to keep our code as neat, clean and readable as possible. Eliminating prefixes for intellisense does not accomplish this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is practically no good reason at all why not to use Hungarian Naming conventions besides just being lazy and worried about having to type 2-3 additional letters.</p>
<p>Intellisense is meant to help but for the most part programmers should not have to hover a mouse over every word to find out what it is. </p>
<p>Your worried about eliminating lbl for a label prefix, why&#8230; Isnt your code cleaner being able to look at it and instantly know it is a label? Are you worried about the additional typing of bits of space those extra letters take up&#8230;</p>
<p>Common sense tells us as programmers to keep our code as neat, clean and readable as possible. Eliminating prefixes for intellisense does not accomplish this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
